Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-03-11 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| -- | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 5G has an overall score of 93.6, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G's 79.4 overall score. Despite of the fact that the Galaxy S10 5G is extremely older than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, it's body is a little thinner and a little bit lighter. Both devices we compare here come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S10 5G has older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a bit better looking display than Galaxy A35 5G, because it has a better 1440 x 3040px resolution, a little bigger display and a higher pixel quantity per inch in the screen. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features much more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because it has more internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a much powerful processing unit than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G takes better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low-light photography and videos and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor taking lot better quality photos and a back facing camera with a much higher resolution.
The Galaxy A35 5G counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.