Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-03-11 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| -- | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10e has a global score of 86.3, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G's 79.4 overall score. The Galaxy S10e body is a little thinner and noticeably lighter than the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, despite of the fact that it was released 5 years before. Galaxy S10e has a screen that is just as good as Galaxy A35 5G's display, because although the Galaxy S10e has a little bit smaller screen and a quite lower 1080 x 2280 resolution, it also counts with a little higher count of pixels per inch of screen.
The Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has a SD extension slot that admits up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy S10e has a very superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G. Both have 6 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a much longer battery life than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3100mAh. The Galaxy A35 5G takes much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light images and video and lower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a lot more megapixels back facing camera and a lot larger back camera sensor which gives a lot better photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.