Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2024-03-11 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| -- | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 has an overall score of 94.8, which is much better than Galaxy A35 5G's global score of 79.4. The Galaxy S20 is an a lot older device than the Galaxy A35 5G, but it's a little thinner and lighter anyway. Both devices we compare here have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S20 has 13 version and Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14 version.
Samsung Galaxy S20 features a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3200 resolution and a higher number of pixels per inch of screen. The Galaxy S20 has a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy S20 also has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy S20 has a much better performance than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy S20 also has 6 GB more RAM. Galaxy A35 5G takes a little bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S20, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor capturing worse quality pictures and videos, and they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a back facing camera with lot more mega pixels and better 30 fps video frame rates.
Galaxy A35 5G features better battery duration than Galaxy S20, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.