Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-03-11 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| -- | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 FE is much better than Galaxy A35 5G, getting a global score of 90.8 against 79.4. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S20 FE has 11 version while Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14. The Galaxy S20 FE design is just a bit lighter than Galaxy A35 5G, although it is a bit thicker and was released 4 years before.
The Galaxy A35 5G counts with a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a just a little less pixels per screen inch and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a quite larger screen. Galaxy S20 FE counts with much more memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy S20 FE also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy S20 FE has a much better performing processor than Galaxy A35 5G. They have 6 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores. The Galaxy A35 5G captures slightly better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has lower video frame rates and a smaller sensor capturing less light and dull colors, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and a same size camera aperture, the Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a way more mega pixels back facing camera.
Galaxy A35 5G counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because it has an 11% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.