Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2024-03-11 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| -- | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a score of 98, which is a lot better than Galaxy A35 5G's score of 79.4. Despite being the best device in this review, Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a notably older, a bit thicker and a bit heavier device than Galaxy A35 5G. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the previous 13 version and Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a little bit better looking display than Galaxy A35 5G, because it has a greater pixel quantity in each inch in the screen, a better 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution and a quite bigger display. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much better memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much better hardware performance than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has 6 GB more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G and Samsung Galaxy A35 5G feature similar batteries performance.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures better pictures and videos than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a smaller camera sensor taking less light and dull colors, and they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with a way better 7680x4320 video resolution and a back facing camera with a way better 108 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.