Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2024-03-11 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| -- | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8.3 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 has a score of 93.4, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G's general score of 79.4. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S22 has an older 13 version while Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14 version. Although Galaxy S22 is extremely older than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, it's construction is just a little thinner and much lighter.
Galaxy S22 features a much faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy S22 also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy S22 has a more vivid display than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340px, the Galaxy S22 also counts with a way brighter display and a quite higher display pixel density.
Galaxy S22 has as much storage capacity to store more games and applications as the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G one, both of them have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy S22 has a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have a camera in the back with a 50 mega-pixels and the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also has a lot bigger sensor taking way higher quality photos and videos and a way higher video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G features superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has a 35% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.