Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2024-03-11 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| -- | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has an overall score of 95.4, which is a lot better than the Galaxy A35 5G's 79.4 global score. Galaxy S22 Ultra's body is a lot older, a little thicker and just a bit heavier than the Galaxy A35 5G. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S22 Ultra has older 13 version while Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14 version.
Galaxy S22 Ultra features a brighter display than Galaxy A35 5G, because it has a lot brighter display, a little bigger screen, a better amount of pixels per inch of screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 3088. The Galaxy A35 5G and the Galaxy S22 Ultra both count with very similar memory to store more games and applications, both have exactly the same internal memory capacity.
Galaxy S22 Ultra features a way better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy S22 Ultra's battery life is just as good as Samsung Galaxy A35 5G's battery performance. Galaxy S22 Ultra has a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a lot more megapixels camera in the back, a way better video definition and a way bigger sensor which offers a way higher image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.