Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-03-11 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 has a score of 79.5, which is slightly better than the Galaxy A35 5G's 79.4 global score. Even though the Galaxy S7 is way older than the Galaxy A35 5G, it's construction is incredibly lighter and just a bit thinner. The Galaxy S7 features a very superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, although it has 4 lesser cpu cores and a smaller amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S7 counts with a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with much more display brightness, a better 1440 x 2560px resolution and a better display pixels density. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G features more memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S7, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy A35 5G has a much longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S7, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G features a much better camera than Galaxy S7, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for capturing images and video in low-light environments, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor and a back facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.