Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-03-11 | 2017-04-21 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| -- | Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 173.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S8 is just a bit better than the Galaxy A35 5G, getting a general score of 81.7 against 79.4. Galaxy S8's body is just a bit thinner and a lot lighter than the Galaxy A35 5G, even though it was released 7 years before. Samsung Galaxy S8 features a little bit better display than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy S8 features a much greater processing power than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores. Galaxy A35 5G features a much better camera than Galaxy S8, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a lot more mega pixels back-facing camera and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor.
The Galaxy S8 has slightly more memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 256 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S8, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.