Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-03-11 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| -- | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S9 is slightly better than Galaxy A35 5G, with a overall score of 83.3 against 79.4. Galaxy S9 is a noticeably older and a little thicker phone than the Galaxy A35 5G, but Samsung made it notably lighter anyway. The Galaxy S9 has a much faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Galaxy S9 features a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2960px. The Galaxy S9 features a greater storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 400 GB.
The Galaxy A35 5G has a much longer battery duration than Galaxy S9, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a better camera than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low light photography and lower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a much bigger sensor which provides a lot higher image and video quality and a camera with a much better 50 MP resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.