Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2024-03-11 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| -- | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 390 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.44 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a score of 80.1, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G's global score of 79.4. Even though Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device than the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, it must be told that it is also an a lot older, somewhat heavier and much thicker device. Both devices we compare here come with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has newer 8.0 Oreo version and Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a much faster CPU than Galaxy A35 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a little bit better display than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a greater display pixel density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560.
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for low light photography and video, it also counts with a lot more MP back-facing camera, a much higher (4K) video resolution and a much bigger sensor.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a better memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G counts with just a bit better battery duration than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has an 11 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.