Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-03-11 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| -- | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 390 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a global score of 81, which is a bit better than the Galaxy A35 5G's 79.4 score. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has the older 11 version and Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a way older, a little heavier and thicker cellphone than Galaxy A35 5G.
Galaxy A35 5G counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a quite lower pixels number per screen inch, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a quite bigger screen. The Galaxy XCover Pro has a greater storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a much powerful CPU than Galaxy A35 5G, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G features greater battery duration than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 23 percent larger battery size. Galaxy A35 5G counts with a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for taking pictures and video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a camera in the back with much more megapixels, a way better (4K) video resolution and a much bigger sensor taking lot better quality videos and photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.