Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2024-03-11 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| -- | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is much better than the Galaxy A35 5G, getting a score of 88.5 against 79.4. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip construction is lighter and thinner than the Galaxy A35 5G, although it was released 4 years before. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has older 12 version while Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14.
Galaxy Z Flip has a lot better processing power than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy Z Flip features a screen that is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G one, although the Galaxy Z Flip also has a little bit bigger screen, a slightly better 1080 x 2636 resolution and a quite better pixel count in each screen inch.
Galaxy A35 5G takes better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same video quality and a F1.8 camera aperture, the Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a lot better 50 megapixels resolution back-facing camera and a way larger sensor taking lot higher quality videos and photos.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a much bigger storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because it has 256 GB internal memory. Galaxy A35 5G counts with a much better battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 52% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.