Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-03-11 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| -- | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is better than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, with a 92.3 score against 79.4. Galaxy Z Flip 5G is an incredibly older cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, but it is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. Both devices in this comparison have Android operating system, but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has 11 version while Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14 version.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a very superior processor than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has more RAM. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a screen that's very similar to the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G one, although the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a just a little greater pixels density, a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2636px and a bit bigger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a superior memory to install applications and games than Galaxy A35 5G, because it has more internal storage capacity. Galaxy A35 5G has a superior battery life than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G shoots better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have the same video definition and a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a much more mega-pixels camera and a lot larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.