Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-03-11 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| -- | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a global score of 94.6, which is much better than the Galaxy A35 5G's 79.4 overall score. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has older 11 version while Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14. Galaxy Z Fold 2's construction is thinner than the Galaxy A35 5G, but it is heavier and was released 4 years before.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a really superior processing power than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has 6 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy A35 5G has a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a little smaller display and a lot worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch of display.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a way bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because it has more internal storage capacity. Galaxy A35 5G takes clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rates and a tinier camera sensor, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same aperture, the Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a way higher 50 MP resolution camera.
The Galaxy A35 5G counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.