Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-03-11 | 2017-06-01 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 6.14 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink, Red and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 390 pixels per inch | 801 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 10.3 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3230mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia XZ Premium is a little bit better than the Galaxy A35 5G, getting a score of 79.8 against 79.4. Xperia XZ Premium is an way older cellphone than Galaxy A35 5G, but it is just a little thinner and a little lighter anyway. Xperia XZ Premium counts with a much better display than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 2160 x 3840px, a way higher pixel count per inch of display and a brighter screen.
The Xperia XZ Premium features just a bit more memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits up to 256 GB. The Xperia XZ Premium counts with a much better hardware performance than Galaxy A35 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G features a very superior battery duration than Sony Xperia XZ Premium, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy A35 5G counts with a superior camera than Xperia XZ Premium, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A35 5G also has a larger back-facing camera sensor providing a better image quality, a much more MP back facing camera and a larger aperture to capture better captures in low-light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.