Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-03-11 | 2018-07-30 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 6.22 x 3.15 x 0.47 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 390 pixels per inch | 760 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 10.4 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3540mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium has a score of 82.2, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G's 79.4 general score. Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium's construction is a lot older, thicker and heavier than the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G. The Xperia XZ2 Premium counts with an incredibly better looking display than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot greater screen pixel density, a way higher resolution of 2160 x 3840 pixels and a way brighter screen.
The Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium features a bigger storage to install games and applications than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 400 GB. The Xperia XZ2 Premium features a lot better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G. Both have a 6 GB RAM memory and 8 CPU cores.
Galaxy A35 5G has a way better battery performance than Xperia XZ2 Premium, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3540mAh. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G takes a little bit better photos and videos than Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same aperture and the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G also has a lot better 50 mega-pixels resolution back camera and a bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a higher photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.