Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-03-11 | 2021-03-29 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 6.47 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 8.25 ounces |
| -- | Ceramic Black and Ceramic White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 516 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 1700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (1920 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 8.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra is much better than Galaxy A35 5G, with a global score of 90.7 against 79.4. Although the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra is better than Galaxy A35 5G, we must tell that it is also a older, a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier device. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has an older 11 version and Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14 version.
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra counts with a sharper display than Galaxy A35 5G, because it has a better screen pixel density, a higher 1440 x 3200px resolution, a lot brighter screen and a bit bigger screen. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra features a superior storage for apps and games than Galaxy A35 5G, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity.
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra counts with a much faster processing unit than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have 8 cores, the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra also has 2 GB more RAM. Galaxy A35 5G and Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra both feature incredibly similar batteries. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra takes a little bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a tinier aperture and a smaller back-facing camera sensor taking lower quality videos and photos, and they both have a back camera with a 50 MP, the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.