Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 81.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-03-11 | 2019-04-15 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 5.81 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 SDM712 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 616 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3070mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has a general score of 81.4, which is a bit better than the Galaxy A35 5G's score of 79.4. Xiaomi Mi 9 SE's design is way lighter and just a little thinner than Galaxy A35 5G, although it was released many years before. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has 9.0 Pie version while Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14 version, providing you some nice extra features and improved performance.
The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE counts with a really superior performance than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G. Both have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount. Xiaomi Mi 9 SE counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE also counts with a little bit brighter screen and a little bit higher pixel density.
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE counts with as much storage capacity to install games and applications as Galaxy A35 5G, both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G counts with a really longer battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3070mAh.
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE counts with a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, although it has a back-facing camera with a lower resolution, a worse (4K) video definition and a smaller sensor shooting lower quality videos and images, they both have the same camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.