Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-03-11 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| -- | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a general score of 87.9, which is much better than the Galaxy A35 5G's 79.4 general score. Even being the best in this comparison review, it must be noted that it's also way older, just a bit heavier and a little thicker. These phones use Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has the previous 10 version while Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14 version.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a really superior performance than Galaxy A35 5G. They have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core processing unit. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a bit sharper display than Galaxy A35 5G, because it has a bit greater quantity of pixels per display inch, a bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution, a little bit larger screen and way more brightness.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro and Galaxy A35 5G both feature very similar storage to store more apps and games, they have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a much better camera than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low light images, it also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor shooting higher quality videos and pictures, a back-facing camera with a lot better 64 mega pixels resolution and a way better video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G counts with just a little better battery life than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.