Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-03-11 | 2020-11-27 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| -- | Cool blue, Power black and Yellow |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 390 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.44 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G is a little bit better than Xiaomi Poco M3, with a overall score of 79.4 against 78.2. Both phones in this comparison use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has 14 version while Xiaomi Poco M3 has Android 10, so it gives lots of additional features. Even though the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G is just a bit heavier than the Xiaomi Poco M3, it's somewhat thinner and extremely newer.
The Galaxy A35 5G counts with a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has a little bit lower count of pixels per display inch, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a quite bigger display. Xiaomi Poco M3 has a very superior CPU than Galaxy A35 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Xiaomi Poco M3 has a quite bigger storage to install games and applications than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Xiaomi Poco M3 has better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because it has a 20% bigger battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G features a bit better camera than Xiaomi Poco M3, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G also has a larger back camera sensor, a way better (4K) video quality and a back camera with a better 50 megapixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.