Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-03-11 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| -- | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 390 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A35 5G has a score of 79.4, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9's general score of 76.6. Although Galaxy A35 5G is just a little bit heavier than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, it's a little bit thinner and also newer. These devices have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A35 5G has 14 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has Android 10, counting with lots of additional features and enhanced performance.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with an extremely better CPU than Galaxy A35 5G, although it has 3 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Galaxy A35 5G features a bit sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch of screen, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a little bit bigger display.
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G features just a bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G also has a larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a back-facing camera with more MP.
Galaxy A35 5G counts with a slightly bigger storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with a battery life that is just as good as the Galaxy A35 5G one, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also has 5020mAh of battery capacity against 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.