Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-03-11 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| -- | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 390 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a global score of 81.1, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy A35 5G's general score of 79.4. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro body has the same weight than the Galaxy A35 5G, but it is just a little bit thicker. These devices use Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has 10 version while Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14.
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G counts with a bit sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, although it has a bit worse display pixel density, a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a quite smaller screen. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with more memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports up to 512 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a much greater processing power than Galaxy A35 5G. Both of them have 6 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a battery performance that is very similar to the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G one, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a 0% bigger battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a little bit better camera than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor and a camera in the back with a lot better 64 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.