Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-03-11 | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| -- | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 390 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A35 5G has an overall score of 79.4, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S's 79 global score. Both of these devices have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A35 5G has the newer 14 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has Android 11 version, counting with some extra features and performance optimizations. The Galaxy A35 5G is a a little bit thinner cellphone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, but both have the same weight.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a much better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G features a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, although it has a quite smaller display, a bit lower amount of pixels per inch in the screen and a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S takes clearer videos and photos than Galaxy A35 5G, although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor which gives a worse photo and video quality, a lower 3840x2160 video quality and a back facing camera with less megapixels, they both have the same aperture. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a bigger storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a battery lifetime that's very similar to Galaxy A35 5G's battery performance, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has a 0 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.