Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2018-10-18 |
| -- | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.22 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A35, getting a score of 80 against 73.9. Google Pixel 3 features a much better looking display than Galaxy A35, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels, it also counts with a just a little greater pixel density.
Google Pixel 3 features a much better performing processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A35, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Galaxy A35 counts with much more storage to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has 64 GB more internal storage. Galaxy A35 features a superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 3 counts with a superior camera than Galaxy A35, although it has a camera in the back with a lot lower 12.2 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.