| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-11-06 |
| -- | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 7.14 ounces |
| -- | Titan gray |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.36 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
LG K92 has a general score of 85.4, which is much better than the Galaxy A35's overall score of 73.9. Both devices in our current comparison work with Android OS (operating system), but LG K92 has older 10 version while Galaxy A35 has Android 14 version. The LG K92 has a much greater processing power than Galaxy A35. They have the same RAM memory amount and 8 cores.
LG K92 features a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A35, because although it has a little bit worse pixel density, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution, the LG K92 also counts with a little bigger screen. The LG K92 takes way better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A35, because it has a back camera with lot more megapixels.
The LG K92 features a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A35, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the LG K92 also has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy A35 counts with improved battery duration than LG K92, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.