Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| -- | 2016-09-01 |
| -- | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| -- | 5.75 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto Z Force is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A35, having a 75.8 score against 73.9. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Moto Z Force has a newer 7.0 Nougat version while Samsung Galaxy A35 has Android 14. Moto Z Force counts with a better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A35, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a better count of pixels per inch in the screen.
Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A35, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Moto Z Force features a much more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy A35, although it has a lower number of cores and a lower amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy A35 counts with a much longer battery duration than Moto Z Force, because it has a 43% greater battery size. The Motorola Moto Z Force shoots much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A35, although it has a camera in the back with much less mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.