Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-07-29 |
| -- | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| -- | 10.02 ounces |
| -- | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 399 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.36 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nokia XR20 has a general score of 80.8, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A35's 73.9 overall score. Both phones in this comparison come with Android operating system, but the Nokia XR20 has the previous 11 version and Samsung Galaxy A35 has Android 14 version. Nokia XR20 features a better display than Samsung Galaxy A35, because although it has a little less pixels per inch of display, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, the Nokia XR20 also counts with a little bigger screen.
Nokia XR20 features a much greater processing power than Galaxy A35. Both have 6 GB of RAM and 8 processing cores. Nokia XR20 has a much bigger storage to install applications and games than Galaxy A35, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Nokia XR20 also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 512 GB.
The Nokia XR20 shoots greater pictures and videos than Galaxy A35. They have the same resolution back camera. Galaxy A35 has just a little bit longer battery life than Nokia XR20, because it has an 8% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.