Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-09-27 |
| -- | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| -- | 9.74 ounces |
| -- | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is much better than Galaxy A35, with a 97.6 score against 73.9. Both of these devices come with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Fold has the newer 9.0 Pie version and Galaxy A35 has Android 14 version, so it gives some additional features and performance optimizations. The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A35, because although it has a bit less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a little larger display and a quite better resolution of 1536 x 2152 pixels.
The Galaxy Fold features a way bigger memory for applications and games than Galaxy A35, because it has more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy Fold features a way better performance than Samsung Galaxy A35, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy A35 has a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because it has a 14% bigger battery capacity. The Galaxy Fold has a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A35, although it has a way less mega-pixels back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.