Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| -- | 2019-02-05 |
| -- | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 6.56 ounces |
| -- | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 6.12 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 12.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.36 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M20 is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A35, with a 78.9 score against 73.9. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy M20 has an older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy A35 has Android 14 version. Galaxy M20 has a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A35, because although it has a quite smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a just a bit higher display density.
Samsung Galaxy M20 has a very superior processor than Samsung Galaxy A35, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Galaxy M20 counts with a bit better camera than Galaxy A35, although it has a lot worse resolution camera in the back. The Samsung Galaxy M20 counts with a better memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A35, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy M20 and Galaxy A35 feature extremely similar batteries.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.