Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-08-21 |
| -- | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| -- | 7.34 ounces |
| -- | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot better than the Galaxy A35, having a general score of 98.9 against 73.9. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has the previous 13 version and Galaxy A35 has Android 14 version. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features an extremely better processor than Samsung Galaxy A35, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a sharper display than Galaxy A35, because it has a little bit larger screen, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px and a quite better screen density. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A35, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy A35 has just a bit better battery life than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4500mAh. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures much better photographs and videos than Galaxy A35, because it has a back camera with a much better 108 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.