Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2017-04-05 |
| -- | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| -- | 5.68 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue and Silver |
| -- | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.36 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia XZs is a little bit better than Galaxy A35, getting a overall score of 77.2 against 73.9. The Sony Xperia XZs has a lot better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A35, although it has less RAM memory and an inferior number of cores (although faster). Xperia XZs features a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A35, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920px and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher pixels density.
Xperia XZs has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A35, although it has a camera with much less mega pixels resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A35 counts with a better storage capacity to install applications and games than Xperia XZs, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy A35 features a much longer battery duration than Xperia XZs, because it has a 72% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.