Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 77.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2016-05-17 |
| -- | 6.81 x 3.48 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 7.16 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 344 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 7.7 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8956 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 6.12 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.18 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4850mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Max is slightly better than the Galaxy A35, having a 77.5 score against 73.9. Xiaomi Mi Max counts with a much greater hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A35, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Xiaomi Mi Max counts with a slightly better display than Galaxy A35, although it has a quite lower amount of pixels per screen inch, a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920px and a quite smaller display.
Xiaomi Mi Max takes much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A35, although it has a back-facing camera with way less MP resolution. Xiaomi Mi Max counts with a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A35, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Xiaomi Mi Max also has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 256 GB.
The Galaxy A35 has a bit longer battery duration than Xiaomi Mi Max, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.