Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-05-20 |
| -- | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.02 ounces |
| -- | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has an overall score of 76.6, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A35's global score of 73.9. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has an older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy A35 has Android 14. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a very superior processor than Samsung Galaxy A35, although it has less RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A35, although it has a little less pixels per inch of screen, a bit lower 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a little bit smaller screen. Galaxy A35 features a bit bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage.
The Galaxy A35 and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 count with incredibly similar battery performance, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also has 5020mAh of battery capacity instead of 5000mAh. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 takes much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy A35. They have a same resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.