Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 15 | -- |
| -- | 2018-09-21 |
| -- | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 6.24 ounces |
| -- | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (5 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 6.12 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS has a global score of 84.2, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (Rumored)'s 75.6 global score. IPhone XS counts with a much more vibrant display than Galaxy A36 5G (Rumored), because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels and a little greater count of pixels per inch in the screen.
Apple iPhone XS counts with a much greater performance than Galaxy A36 5G (Rumored), because although it has a lower amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bit processor. Galaxy A36 5G (Rumored) features a much bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than iPhone XS, because it has 64 GB more internal memory.
The iPhone XS shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (Rumored), although it has a back camera with a much lower resolution and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition. The Galaxy A36 5G (Rumored) has a superior battery lifetime than Apple iPhone XS, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2659mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.