Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 15 | Android 5.0 |
| -- | 2015-03-01 |
| -- | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| -- | 5.54 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 390 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.4 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.9 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
HTC One M9 is a bit better than the Galaxy A36 5G (Rumored), with a score of 77.7 against 75.6. Both devices we compare here come with Android OS (Operating System), but HTC One M9 has the older 5.0 version and Galaxy A36 5G (Rumored) has Android 15. The HTC One M9 counts with a way better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (Rumored), because although it has a way smaller display and a little bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, it also counts with a just a little greater number of pixels in each inch of screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (Rumored) features a much better storage for applications and games than HTC One M9, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The HTC One M9 counts with a much more powerful CPU than Galaxy A36 5G (Rumored), because although it has 3 GB less RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with an extra graphics co-processor and a 64-bit processor.
HTC One M9 counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy A36 5G (Rumored), although it has a much lower resolution camera and a worse (4K) video definition. Galaxy A36 5G (Rumored) features a much longer battery life than HTC One M9, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 2840mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.