Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 15 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| -- | 2016-09-01 |
| -- | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| -- | 5.75 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto Z Force has a global score of 75.8, which is slightly better than the Galaxy A36 5G (Rumored)'s 75.6 overall score. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Moto Z Force has 7.0 Nougat version while Galaxy A36 5G (Rumored) has Android 15, counting with a lot of extra features.
Motorola Moto Z Force has a way better processing power than Galaxy A36 5G (Rumored), although it has an inferior number of cores and 2 GB less RAM memory. The Motorola Moto Z Force has a better screen than Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (Rumored), because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher screen density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
Moto Z Force counts with a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (Rumored), although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a lot less mega-pixels camera in the back. Motorola Moto Z Force features a much greater memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (Rumored), because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy A36 5G (Rumored) counts with a much better battery life than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a 43% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.