Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 15 | -- |
| -- | 2020-08-21 |
| -- | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 6.84 ounces |
| -- | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 390 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a lot better than the Galaxy A36 5G (Rumored), with a 90.8 score against 75.6. Galaxy Note 20 features a much better performing CPU than Galaxy A36 5G (Rumored), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Note 20 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy Note 20 counts with a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A36 5G (Rumored), because it has a just a bit higher pixels density, a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a little bigger display. Galaxy A36 5G (Rumored) and Samsung Galaxy Note 20 feature incredibly similar memory for games and applications, both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (Rumored) features superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 16% larger battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 captures a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy A36 5G (Rumored), because although it has a camera with a much lower resolution, it also counts with a lot higher video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.