Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-08-21 |
| -- | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| -- | 7.34 ounces |
| -- | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than Galaxy A36 5G (Rumored), getting a 98.9 score against 75.6. Both of these devices come with Android OS, but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has the older 13 version and Galaxy A36 5G (Rumored) has Android 15 version. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a better screen than Galaxy A36 5G (Rumored), because it has a higher amount of pixels per inch in the screen, a better resolution of 1440 x 3088px and a little bit bigger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a way better processing power than Galaxy A36 5G (Rumored), and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (Rumored), and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a SD card slot that supports up to 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (Rumored) features a little longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4500mAh. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (Rumored), because it has a way more mega pixels back facing camera and a way higher video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.