Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| -- | 2013-09-04 |
| -- | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 5.93 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 is a bit better than Galaxy A36 5G (Rumored), with an 81.2 score against 75.6. These devices have Android operating system, but the Galaxy Note 3 has the older 5.0 version while Galaxy A36 5G (Rumored) has Android 15. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features a much more powerful processor than Galaxy A36 5G (Rumored), because although it has 3 GB less RAM memory and less cpu cores , it also counts with an extra GPU.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has an incredibly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (Rumored), although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch in the screen, a little smaller screen and a little lower 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution. Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (Rumored) has a slightly better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (Rumored) counts with a very superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3200mAh. The Galaxy A36 5G (Rumored) captures a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A36 5G (Rumored) also has a way better resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.