Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| -- | 2020-04-04 |
| -- | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| -- | 9.03 ounces |
| -- | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 390 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (5 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.9 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a score of 80.1, which is slightly better than Galaxy A36 5G (Rumored)'s 75.6 general score. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy XCover FieldPro has the newer 8.0 Oreo version while Galaxy A36 5G (Rumored) has Android 15. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a lot better looking display than Galaxy A36 5G (Rumored), because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a higher pixel density.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a much better performing processor than Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (Rumored), although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy A36 5G (Rumored) features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a way higher 50 MP resolution back-facing camera and a lot better 3840x2160 video definition.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a quite bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy A36 5G (Rumored), because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Galaxy A36 5G (Rumored) has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.