Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-01-31 |
| -- | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| -- | 7.76 ounces |
| -- | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 390 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (5 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (Rumored), getting an 81 score against 75.6. Both phones in this comparison review have Android operating system, but the Galaxy XCover Pro has older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (Rumored) has Android 15. Galaxy XCover Pro features a bit sharper display than Galaxy A36 5G (Rumored), because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, the Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch of screen.
Galaxy XCover Pro features a much better performing processor than Galaxy A36 5G (Rumored), although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Galaxy XCover Pro features more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A36 5G (Rumored), because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 512 GB.
Galaxy A36 5G (Rumored) counts with superior battery duration than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4050mAh. The Galaxy A36 5G (Rumored) has just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a lot higher resolution back facing camera and a much higher video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.