Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-10 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.69 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 4.94 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 437 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A40, with an 81.9 score against 79.6. The Google Pixel 4 design is just a little thicker and somewhat heavier than the Samsung Galaxy A40. Google Pixel 4 counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy A40, because although it has a bit smaller display and a little worse 1080 x 2280px resolution, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixels count per inch of screen.
The Google Pixel 4 has a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A40, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has more RAM memory. The Google Pixel 4 has just a bit better camera than Galaxy A40, because although it has a way lower resolution camera, and they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Google Pixel 4 also counts with a lot better video quality and a bigger sensor capturing better quality videos and photographs.
Samsung Galaxy A40 has a superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A40 also has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A40 features just a bit longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has 3100mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.