Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-04-10 | 2020-11-06 |
| 5.69 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.94 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Titan gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 437 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG K92 is slightly better than Galaxy A40, having an 85.4 score against 79.6. These devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but the LG K92 has the previous 10 version while Galaxy A40 has Android 11 version. Even though the LG K92 is newer than Galaxy A40, it's noticeably heavier and just a little thicker.
The LG K92 features a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A40, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG K92 also has 2 GB more RAM. Galaxy A40 has a little more vivid screen than LG K92, because although it has a quite smaller display and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a bit higher screen pixels density.
The LG K92 takes way better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A40, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a way bigger sensor, a lot more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a way better video definition. The LG K92 features a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A40, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a SD memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The LG K92 has greater battery lifetime than Galaxy A40, because it has a 29 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.