Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-04-10 | 2020-03-20 |
| 5.69 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.94 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Blue and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 437 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 9.46 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ has an overall score of 87.6, which is better than the Galaxy A40's 79.6 global score. Both devices we are comparing here work with the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so both should provide the user all the same operating system features. LG V60 ThinQ's construction is newer, but notably heavier and somewhat thicker than the Galaxy A40.
The LG V60 ThinQ features a bit faster CPU than Galaxy A40, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has 4 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy A40 counts with a slightly better looking display than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a little more pixels per display inch.
The LG V60 ThinQ takes a little bit better videos and photos than Galaxy A40, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a lot bigger back camera sensor providing a much higher image quality, a much higher 7680x4320 video definition and a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back.
The LG V60 ThinQ has a superior storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A40, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. The LG V60 ThinQ features a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy A40, because it has a 61% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.