Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-04-10 | 2020-10-15 |
| 5.69 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 4.94 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 437 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Wing is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A40, with a 91.2 score against 79.6. LG Wing's design is newer than Samsung Galaxy A40's, although it is heavier and thicker. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but LG Wing has 10 version and Samsung Galaxy A40 has Android 11 version.
Galaxy A40 features a bit better looking display than LG Wing, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a little better pixel density. The LG Wing has much more storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A40, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB and 256 GB internal storage.
The LG Wing features a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A40, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG Wing also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The LG Wing has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A40, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for shooting pictures in low light situations, it also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality, a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a much more mega-pixels camera in the back.
The LG Wing counts with improved battery performance than Galaxy A40, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3100mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.