Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-04-10 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.69 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 4.94 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Smoke black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 437 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A40 has a score of 79.6, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto G Power's 76.1 general score. Samsung Galaxy A40's body is extremely lighter and somewhat thinner than the Motorola Moto G Power, despite of the fact that it was released only 12 months before. Both devices we are comparing here come with the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't see any difference regarding that.
Samsung Galaxy A40 has a little sharper display than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a little bit more pixels per inch in the display. Moto G Power features a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy A40. Both of them have a Octa-Core CPU and 4 GB of RAM.
The Motorola Moto G Power shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A40, and although they both have the same aperture, a 0.36 inches sensor and a back-facing camera with a 16 MP resolution, the Motorola Moto G Power also has a lot higher (4K) video definition. The Galaxy A40 and the Moto G Power both feature incredibly similar storage for apps and games, they have an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB and the same internal storage.
Moto G Power has a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A40, because it has a 61 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.