Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-10 | 2017-08-10 |
| 5.69 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 4.94 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 437 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A40 is a bit better than Moto Z2 Force Edition, having a global score of 79.6 against 77.4. Although the Galaxy A40 is thicker than Moto Z2 Force Edition, it's just a little bit lighter and newer. Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition has a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A40, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a just a little better number of pixels in each inch of display.
Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition has a much greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A40, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition also has an external SD slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. Moto Z2 Force Edition features a little better processing power than Galaxy A40. They have 8 cores and a 4 GB RAM memory.
Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition captures a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy A40, because although it has a smaller sensor, a smaller aperture which is not nice for taking photographs and videos in poorly lited environments and a camera in the back with a lot lower resolution, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Galaxy A40 features a bit better battery performance than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 3100mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.