Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-04-10 | 2020-05-21 |
| 5.69 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches |
| 4.94 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Moonlight Black and Starry Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 437 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A40 is a bit better than OPPO Find X2 Neo, with a general score of 79.6 against 77.7. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A40 has the newer 11 version while OPPO Find X2 Neo has Android 10. Samsung Galaxy A40's body is lighter than the OPPO Find X2 Neo, but it's just a little bit thicker and was released around a year before.
OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A40, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A40, because although it has a just a little worse screen pixels density, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a little larger display.
OPPO Find X2 Neo features a very superior camera than Galaxy A40, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a way bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a back-facing camera with a lot better 48 MP resolution and a much higher 3840x2160 video quality.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with a bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A40, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory. The OPPO Find X2 Neo has greater battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A40, because it has 4025mAh of battery capacity instead of 3100mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.