Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-04-10 | 2021-06-24 |
| 5.69 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.94 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 437 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7904 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A22 5G is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A40, getting a global score of 84.6 against 79.6. The Galaxy A22 5G design is a lot newer, but thicker and extremely heavier than Samsung Galaxy A40. Both phones in this comparison review use the same Android 11 OS. The Galaxy A22 5G counts with a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A40. Both have a Octa-Core processing unit and 4 GB of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A40 features a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen and a little lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a little greater display density. Galaxy A22 5G features a better storage for games and applications than Galaxy A40, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A22 5G also has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has a little bit better camera than Galaxy A40, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light captures and videos, and they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with a much better 48 megapixels resolution.
The Galaxy A22 5G counts with a superior battery duration than Galaxy A40, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3100mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.